<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="no"?>
<!DOCTYPE article SYSTEM "http://www.soc-geogr-discuss.net/inc/sgd/copernicus.dtd">
<article language="en">
	<journal>
		<journal_title>Social Geography Discussions</journal_title>
		<journal_url>www.soc-geogr-discuss.net</journal_url>
		<issn>1816-1499</issn>
		<eissn>1816-1502</eissn>
		<volume_number>3</volume_number>
		<issue_number>1</issue_number>
		<publication_year>2007</publication_year>
	</journal>
	<doi>10.5194/sgd-3-121-2007</doi>
	<article_url>http://www.soc-geogr-discuss.net/3/121/2007/</article_url>
	<abstract_html>http://www.soc-geogr-discuss.net/3/121/2007/sgd-3-121-2007.html</abstract_html>
	<fulltext_pdf>http://www.soc-geogr-discuss.net/3/121/2007/sgd-3-121-2007.pdf</fulltext_pdf>
	<start_page>121</start_page>
	<end_page>157</end_page>
	<publication_date>2007-02-16</publication_date>
	<article_title content_type="html">International collaboration, mobility and team diversity in the life sciences: impact on research performance</article_title>
	<authors>
		<author numeration="1" affiliations="1">
			<name>F. Barjak</name>
			<email>franz.barjak@fhnw.ch</email>
		</author>
		<author numeration="2" affiliations="2">
			<name>S. Robinson</name>
		</author>
	</authors>
	<affiliations>
		<affiliation numeration="1" content_type="html">School of Business, University of Applied Sciences, Olten, Switzerland</affiliation>
		<affiliation numeration="2" content_type="html">empirica, Gesellschaft für Kommunikations- und Technologieforschung mbH, Bonn, Germany</affiliation>
	</affiliations>
	<abstract content_type="html">The combination of knowledge and skills from different backgrounds or
research cultures is often considered good for science. This paper describes
the extent to which academic research teams in the life sciences draw on
knowledge from different research cultures and how this is related to their
research performance. We distinguish between international collaboration
between research teams and international mobility leading to team diversity,
where scientists with a background in another country work as members of a
team over time. Our results show that the most successful teams both have a
moderate level of team diversity and engage in collaboration activities
resulting in joint publications with scientists in other countries. These
results have implications for research team management and for research
policy, in particular in relation to the mobility of scientists.</abstract>
	<references>
		<reference numeration="1" content_type="text"> Adams, J. D., Black, G. C., Clemmons, J. R., and Stephan, E.: Scientific teams and institutional collaborations: evidence from U.S. universities, 1981&amp;ndash;1999, Research Policy, 34, 3, 259&amp;ndash;285, 2005. </reference>
		<reference numeration="2" content_type="text"> Andrews, F. M. (Ed.): Scientific productivity, the effectiveness of research groups in six countries, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1979. </reference>
		<reference numeration="3" content_type="text"> Arora, A., David, A., and Gambardella, A.: Reputation and competence in publicly funded science: estimating the effects on research group productivity, Annales d&apos;Economie et de Statistique, 49/50, 163&amp;ndash;198, 1998. </reference>
		<reference numeration="4" content_type="text"> Barjak, F.: Team diversity and research collaboration in life sciences teams: does a combination of research cultures pay off? University of Applied Sciences Northwestern Switzerland, Olten, 2006. </reference>
		<reference numeration="5" content_type="text"> Bonaccorsi, A. and Daraio, C.: Exploring size and agglomeration effects on public research productivity, Scientometrics, 63, 1, 87&amp;ndash;120, 2005. </reference>
		<reference numeration="6" content_type="text"> Bordons, M. and Gomez, I.: Collaboration networks in science, in: The web of knowledge: a Festschrift in honor of Eugene Garfield, edited by: Cronin, B. and Atkins, H. B., Information Today, Inc., Medford, NJ, USA, pp 197&amp;ndash;213, 2000. </reference>
		<reference numeration="7" content_type="text"> Bordons, M., Gomez, I., Fernandez, M., Zulueta, M. A., and Mendez, A.: Local, domestic and international scientific collaboration in biomedical research, Scientometrics, 37, 2, 279&amp;ndash;295, 1996. </reference>
		<reference numeration="8" content_type="text"> Bordons, M. and Zulueta, M. A.: Comparison of research team activity in two biomedical fields, Scientometrics, 40, 3, 423&amp;ndash;436, 1997. </reference>
		<reference numeration="9" content_type="text"> Borgman, C. and Furner, J.: Scholarly communication and bibliometrics, Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 36, 3&amp;ndash;72, 2002. </reference>
		<reference numeration="10" content_type="text"> Bunderson, J. S., and Sutcliffe, K. M.: Comparing alternative conceptualizations of functional diversity in management teams: Process and performance effects, Academy of Management Journal, 45, 5, 875&amp;ndash;893, 2002. </reference>
		<reference numeration="11" content_type="text"> Cameron, A. C. and Trivedi: K.: Regression analysis of count data, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1998. </reference>
		<reference numeration="12" content_type="text"> Carayol, N. and Matt, M.: Does research organization influence academic production? Laboratory level evidence from a large European university, Research Policy, 33, 8, 1081&amp;ndash;1102, 2004. </reference>
		<reference numeration="13" content_type="text"> Carayol, N. and Nguyen Thi, T. U.: Why do Academic Scientists Engage in Interdisciplinary Research?, http://cournot2.u-strasbg.fr/users/beta/publications/2004/2004-17.pdf (download 07-06-2005), 2004. </reference>
		<reference numeration="14" content_type="text"> Cesaroni, F. and Gambardella, A.: Research productivity and the allocation of resources in publicly funded research programmes, in: Science and innovation rethinking the rationales for funding and governance, edited by: Geuna, A., Salter, A., and Steinmueller, W. E., Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK and Northampton, MA, USA, pp 202&amp;ndash;232, 2003. </reference>
		<reference numeration="15" content_type="text"> Cohen, J. E.: Publication rate as a function of laboratory size in 3 biomedical-research institutions, Scientometrics, 3, 6, 467&amp;ndash;487, 1981. </reference>
		<reference numeration="16" content_type="text"> Cronin, B.: The citation process. The role and significance of citations in scientific communication, Taylor Graham, London, 1984. </reference>
		<reference numeration="17" content_type="text"> Earley, C. and Mosakowski, E.: Creating hybrid team cultures: An empirical test of transnational team functioning, Academy of Management Journal, 43, 1, 26&amp;ndash;49, 2000. </reference>
		<reference numeration="18" content_type="text"> European Commission: Towards a European research area. COM(2000) 6, http://europa.eu/eur-lex/en/com/cnc/2000/com2000_0006en01.pdf (download 30-11-2006), 2000. </reference>
		<reference numeration="19" content_type="text"> European Commission: A mobility strategy for the European Research Area. COM(2001) 331 final, http://ec.europa.eu/eracareers/docs/Com_2001_331_en.pdf (download 30-11-2006), 2001. </reference>
		<reference numeration="20" content_type="text"> European Commission: Third European Report on Science and Technology Indicators 2003 &amp;ndash; Towards a knowledge-based economy, European Commission, Brussels, 2003. </reference>
		<reference numeration="21" content_type="text"> European Commission: Commission Recommendation of 11 March 2005 on the European Charter for Researchers and on a Code of Conduct for the Recruitment of Researchers, http://ec.europa.eu/eracareers/pdf/am509774CEE_EN_E4.pdf (download 25-03-2006), 2005. </reference>
		<reference numeration="22" content_type="text"> Fiol, C. M. and O&apos;Connor, E. J.: Identification in Face-to-Face, Hybrid, and Pure Virtual Teams: Untangling the Contradictions, Organization Science, 16, 1, 19&amp;ndash;32, 2005. </reference>
		<reference numeration="23" content_type="text"> Georghiou, L.: Global cooperation in research, Research Policy, 27, 6, 611&amp;ndash;626, 1998. </reference>
		<reference numeration="24" content_type="text"> Glänzel, W.: National Characteristics in International Scientific Co-authorship Relations, Scientometrics, 51, 1, 69&amp;ndash;115, 2001. </reference>
		<reference numeration="25" content_type="text"> Glänzel, W. and Schubert, A.: Double Effort = Double Impact? A Critical View at International Co-authorship in Chemistry, Scientometrics, 50, 2, 199&amp;ndash;214, 2001. </reference>
		<reference numeration="26" content_type="text"> Greene, W. H.: Econometric Analysis, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ, [1993]2000. </reference>
		<reference numeration="27" content_type="text"> Hagstrom, W.: The scientific community, Basic books, New York, 1965. </reference>
		<reference numeration="28" content_type="text"> Harsanyi, M. A.: Multiple authors, multiple problems &amp;ndash; bibliometrics and the study of scholarly collaboration: a literature review, Library and Information Science Research, 15, 325&amp;ndash;354, 1993. </reference>
		<reference numeration="29" content_type="text"> Herbertz, H.: Does it pay to collaborate? A bibliometric case study in molecular biology, Scientometrics, 33, 1, 117&amp;ndash;122, 1995. </reference>
		<reference numeration="30" content_type="text"> Hollingsworth, J. R. and Hollingsworth, E.: Major Discoveries and Biomedical Research Organizations: Perspectives on Interdisciplinarity, Nurturing Leadership, and Integrated Structure and Cultures, http://www.umu.se/inforsk/universitetsligan/hollingsworth.html (08-03-2005), 2000. </reference>
		<reference numeration="31" content_type="text"> Jehn, K. A., Northcraft, G. B., and Neale, M. A.: Why differences make a difference: A field study of diversity, conflict, and performance in workgroups, Administrative Science Quarterly, 44, 4, 741&amp;ndash;763, 1999. </reference>
		<reference numeration="32" content_type="text"> Jöns, H.: Grenzüberschreitende Mobilität und Kooperation in den Wissenschaften: Deutschlandaufenthalte US-amerikanischer Humboldt-Forschungspreisträger aus einer erweiterten Akteursnetzwerkperspektive, Department of Geography, Heidelberg, 2003. </reference>
		<reference numeration="33" content_type="text"> Jöns, H.: Internationale Mobilität von Wissen und Wissensproduzenten, in: GrenzWerte. Tagungsbericht und wissenschaftliche Abhandlungen. 55. Deutscher Geographentag Trier 2005, edited by: Kulke, E., Monheim, H. and Wittmann, P., DGFG, Berlin, Leipzig, Trier, pp 151&amp;ndash;160, 2006. </reference>
		<reference numeration="34" content_type="text"> Katz, J. S. and Martin, B. R.: What is research collaboration?, Research Policy, 26, 1, 1&amp;ndash;18, 1997. </reference>
		<reference numeration="35" content_type="text"> Larédo, P. and Mustar, P.: Laboratory Activity Profiles: An Exploratory Approach, Scientometrics, 47, 3, 515&amp;ndash;539, 2000. </reference>
		<reference numeration="36" content_type="text"> Lau, D. C. and Murnighan, J. K.: Demographic diversity and faultlines: The compositional dynamics of organizational groups, Academy of Management Review, 23, 2, 325&amp;ndash;340, 1998. </reference>
		<reference numeration="37" content_type="text"> Laudel, G.: Collaboration, creativity and rewards: why and how scientists collaborate, International Journal of Technology Management, 22, 7/8, 762&amp;ndash;781, 2001. </reference>
		<reference numeration="38" content_type="text"> Li, J. and Hambrick, D.: Factional groups: A new vantage on demographic faultlines, conflict, and disintegration in work teams, Academy of Management Journal, 48, 794&amp;ndash;813, 2005. </reference>
		<reference numeration="39" content_type="text"> Leeuwen, T. N. v., Moed, H. F., Tijssen, R. J. W., Visser, M. S., and Raan, A. F. J. v.: Language biases in the coverage of the Science Citation Index and its consequences for international comparisons of national research performance, Scientometrics, 51, 1, 335&amp;ndash;346, 2001. </reference>
		<reference numeration="40" content_type="text"> Narin, F., Stevens, K., and Whitlow, E. S.: Scientific collaboration in Europe and the citation of multinationally authored papers, Scientometrics, 21, 313&amp;ndash;323, 1991. </reference>
		<reference numeration="41" content_type="text"> National Science Board: Science and Engineering Indicators 2002, National Science Foundation, Arlington, VA, 2002. </reference>
		<reference numeration="42" content_type="text"> National Science Board: Science and Engineering Indicators 2004, National Science Foundation, Arlington, VA, 2004. </reference>
		<reference numeration="43" content_type="text"> Persson, O., Glänzel, W., and Dannell, R.: A relational charting approach to the world of basic research in twelve science fields at the end of the second millennium, Scientometrics, 55, 3, 335&amp;ndash;348, 2004. </reference>
		<reference numeration="44" content_type="text"> Raan, A. v.: The use of bibliometric analysis in research performance assessment and monitoring of interdisciplinary scientific developments, Technikfolgenabschätzung &amp;ndash; Theorie und Praxis, 12, 1, 20&amp;ndash;29, 2003. </reference>
		<reference numeration="45" content_type="text"> Seglen: O. and Aksnes, D. W.: Scientific Productivity and Group Size: A Bibliometric Analysis of Norwegian Microbiological Research, Scientometrics, 49, 1, 125&amp;ndash;143, 2000. </reference>
		<reference numeration="46" content_type="text"> Stankiewicz, R.: The size and age of Swedish academic research groups and their scientific performance, in: Scientific productivity: the effectiveness of research groups in six countries, edited by: Andrews, F. M., Cambridge University Press and UNESCO, Cambridge and Paris, pp 191&amp;ndash;222, 1979. </reference>
		<reference numeration="47" content_type="text"> Stephan: E. and Levin, S. G.: Exceptional contributions to US science by the foreign-born and foreign-educated, Population Research and Policy Review, 20, 1, 59&amp;ndash;79, 2001. </reference>
		<reference numeration="48" content_type="text"> Thatcher, S. M. B., Jehn, K. A., and Zanutto, E.: Cracks in diversity research: The effects of diversity faultlines on conflict and performance, Group Decision and Negotiation, 12, 3, 217&amp;ndash;241, 2003. </reference>
		<reference numeration="49" content_type="text"> Thelwall, M.: Web use and peer interconnectivity metrics for academic web sites, Journal of Information Science, 29, 1, 1&amp;ndash;10, 2003. </reference>
		<reference numeration="50" content_type="text"> Thorsteinsdóttir, O. H.: External Research Collaboration in Two Small Science Systems, Scientometrics, 49, 1, 145&amp;ndash;160, 2000. </reference>
		<reference numeration="51" content_type="text"> von Tunzelmann, N., Ranga, M., Martin, B., and Geuna, A.: The Effects of Size on Research Performance: A SPRU Review, SPRU, Brighton, 2003. </reference>
		<reference numeration="52" content_type="text"> Wagner, C. S.: Six case studies of international collaboration in science, Scientometrics, 62, 1, 3&amp;ndash;26, 2005. </reference>
		<reference numeration="53" content_type="text"> Williams, K. Y. and O&apos;Reilly, C. A.: Demography and diversity in organizations: A review of 40 years of research, Research in Organizational Behaviour, 20, 77&amp;ndash;140, 1998. </reference>
	</references>
</article>
